
A pricing illusion where a deliberate, inferior third option is introduced purely to make the most expensive option look like an absolute steal.
You are buying coffee. Small is $3, Large is $7. You want the small. They introduce a Medium for $6.50. You:
👇 Choose one option:
Humans suck at absolute valuation. We don't know how much anything should cost. Instead, we rely on relative comparisons. When you introduce an asymmetrically dominated 'decoy' (priced similarly to the premium option but offering much less), the brain stops evaluating the price and starts evaluating the contrast. The decoy removes the cognitive load of decision-making by creating a false sense of getting a deal.
Behavioral economist Dan Ariely noticed an ad for The Economist: Digital-only for $59, Print-only for $125, and Print + Digital for $125. The Print-only option was the decoy. When tested without the decoy, 68% of people chose the cheaper digital option. With the decoy, 84% chose the expensive combo. The decoy didn't sell a single unit itself, but it generated a massive revenue surge by hacking the consumer's perception of value.
Strip away the comparisons. Ask yourself: What is this exact item objectively worth to me in a vacuum?
Actively identify and cross out the middle option that exists purely to make the premium look like a bargain.
Decide your absolute maximum spend limit before you ever look at the pricing tiers.